Theodor W. Adorno stated in 1951 that he considered writing poetry after Auschwitz “barbaric”. Adorno – who later modified his dictum – meant that art cannot show the suffering of the victims commensurately, and that therefore the project of doing so risks turning into an unworthy aestheticisation of the horror, a gleaning of pleasure from pain or an illusory giving of meaning to a catastrophe which was actually meaningless. George Steiner also claimed that art is trivial or impertinent in the face of the Holocaust. Against this we claim that there is a Holocaust literature that goes beyond mimesis. Lawrence Langer argues that artistic treatment of the Holocaust is characterised not by a doomed attempt simply to transpose …
4655 words
Citation: White, Alfred D.. "German Literature of the Holocaust". The Literary Encyclopedia. First published 12 March 2007 [https://staging.litencyc.com/php/stopics.php?rec=true&UID=1718, accessed 21 November 2024.]
